ser·en·dip·i·ty
[ˌserənˈdipədē]
the occurrence and development of events by chance in a happy or beneficial way:
"a fortunate stroke of serendipity" ·
The FBI has a way of stumbling upon things. 11 days before Election
Day, FBI Director James Comey released a letter to eight Republican
committee chairs stating that, while investigating an unrelated case,
the FBI had discovered emails that might be connected to the bureau's
investigation of Hillary Clinton's State Department emails and that he
was extending, therefore, that investigation. Hillary's campaign hit
back with a
one - two punch.
Fast-forward to this week.
Comey
was clear in stating that this evidence did not surface via the
investigation of possible Trump campaign collusion with Russian
operatives, but, rather, arose from a different investigation,
apparently involving surveillance of foreign operatives.
In other
words, the FBI came upon this information much the way they discovered
emails related to Hillary Clinton on Anthony Weiner's laptop - emails,
it turned out, that the bureau had already seen. They were investigating
Weiner, and some of Hillary's emails appeared.
For the record,
the fact that these "foreign" communications turned up in a bureau
investigation and Comey announced it does not absolve Comey of releasing
that October 28 letter and probably influencing the vote.
In this case, they were surveilling foreign operatives, and - whoops! Trump campaign staff were talking to them!
Everything is a big, fat mess. As Leonard Cohen said, "There's a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Comey
violated bureau policy when he released that letter 11 days before the
election. The emails in question would have been a huge nothing-burger
had the letter not been released so close to Election Day. As it turned
out, the letter was likely a factor in turning the election against
Hillary Clinton and electing the guy whose campaign, transition team,
and administration are riddled with Russian ties.
How ironic and
how fitting! Karma can really suck when it's bad. Unfortunately, this
bad karma for the Trump regime is unlikely to change anything.
Confirmation hearings continue for appointees and a SCOTUS justice
nominated by what could possibly be proven an illegitimate
administration.
This is the kind of malarkey being spouted by a
Democrat!
“It’s
only natural for us to want to go back and relive the elections,” said
Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.). “But that’s not going to happen. It’s about
moving forward in the future. I think my Republican colleagues said it
best when they said it happened to Democrats this time, it may very well
happen to Republicans in the future, and that’s why it’s important to
seek the truth.”
Read more at HuffPo >>>>
What? We should just keep on truckin' like all of this is normal because ... what? Because it
may happen to Republicans at some unspecified point in the future? Sorry, but that should not be allowed to wash. This should
never happen in
any U.S. election. Period. That is the whole reason people are upset about it.
If
this administration is found to have committed high crimes and
misdemeanors and /or treason, the office of POTUS should not simply pass
to the Veep of the same administration. I know we have no provision in
the Constitution for this possibility, but that does not mean that we
should just ignore a festering wound to our democracy. The situation is
unprecedented. Whether collusion is eventually proven or not, steps
should be taken to ensure the security of future elections.