Remarks at Women's Breakfast
Remarks
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Prinz Carl Palais
Munich, Germany
February 5, 2012
SECRETARY CLINTON:
(Applause.) Well, thank you so much. Thanks to the Bavarian State
Chancellery, which is hosting us, especially to Minister Merk, for
organizing this breakfast, and to all of you for getting up so early on a
Sunday morning in the cold to come out to show solidarity and support
for women in international security. I wanted to make just a few brief
comments and then if anyone has something they want to say or ask before
I have to go to Bulgaria, I would be very pleased to respond.
I
wanted to just focus our attention on an area that is of critical
importance in which we are making some, but not enough, progress. And
that was the passage of the historic UN Security Council Resolution
1325. We recognize that when we think about peacemaking, which is, after
all, one of the critical tasks of any of us in international security,
that something is missing. And that is women. There are not enough women
at the table, not enough women's voices being heard. And when the
Security Council passed Resolution 1325, we tried to make a very clear
statement, that women are still largely shut out of the negotiations
that seek to end conflicts, even though women and children are the
primary victims of 21st century conflict.
And this is not just a
faraway problem. Where I was sitting up on the stage at the Munich
conference, I was trying to count what looked to be the heads of women.
And there were not enough, I have to tell you. (Applause.)
PARTICIPANT: Thirty-seven.
SECRETARY CLINTON: I don't know. Thirty-seven? Thirty-seven. Well, I didn't get that high a number, but I take your word for it.
And
in the last two decades, dozens of conflicts have persisted because
peace efforts were unsuccessful. Talks broke down, agreements were
broken, parties found it easier to fight than to negotiate. And far too
often in these failed efforts women were marginalized, making up, by one
estimate, just eight percent of all peace negotiators. And when you
look around the world, as a number of us are privileged to do in the
positions that we hold now, or that we have held in the past, you see
how hard it is to make peace under any circumstance. But the exclusion
of women, I argue, makes it even harder.
Because there is a great
story about an effort to try to resolve aspects of the conflict in
Darfur a few years ago. And the men had been arguing and arguing for
days about authority over a particular riverbed. And finally, a woman
heard about this and just made herself walk in and say, "But that river
dried up. There is no water in that river." Or think about the wonderful
documentary, "Pray the Devil Back to Hell," about the women in Liberia.
But for them, who knows whether that conflict would have ended?
And
so that is why, in December, finally, the United States, under
President Obama, launched the first-ever U.S. national action plan on
women, peace, and security. We worked very hard on this, and we did it
jointly, between the State Department and the Defense Department.
Because, from our perspective, it was essential that we have a
comprehensive road map for accelerating and institutionalizing efforts
across the United States Government to advance women's participation in
making and keeping peace.
And the national action plan represents a
fundamentally different way for the United States to do business. It is
really trying to lay out a new approach in our diplomatic, military,
and development support to women in areas of conflict, and to ensure
that their perspectives and that considerations of gender are always
part of how the United States approaches peace processes, conflict
prevention, the protection of civilians, humanitarian assistance.
Now,
more than 30 countries, many of them represented here, have had similar
national action plans developed. And we think the United Nations really
deserves our support in making sure that we continue this progress.
NATO itself has a robust effort, increasingly factoring women and their
needs into key planning processes and training courses, and stationing
experts throughout operational headquarters.
Now, I am well aware
that whenever I talk about these issues, as opposed to who we are going
to strike next and what kind of tough position we are going to take, it
is often dismissed as soft or relegated to the margins of the real
conversation. Well, we just completely reject that. And the evidence is
so clear that rejecting it is the right decision. So if you look at what
we did with the Department of State, Department of Defense, USAID,
others across our government, it incorporates the lessons that our
military has learned over, frankly, 10 years of war about the links
between the security of women and the stability and peace of nations.
For
example, the Department of State works closely with the Department of
Defense on the Global Peace Operations Initiative, which has facilitated
the training of more than 2,000 female peacekeepers worldwide, many
from African countries, where persistent conflict is so devastating to
women and children.
In Afghanistan we have tried to increase the
role of women, no easy task. We sent our own teams of female soldiers,
as did other NATO-ISAF countries, to curb violence against women, honor
killings, female immolation, as well as pursue certain security
functions such as inspections and personal examinations. And in 2010, 10
percent of the Afghan military academy's class will be women. And by
2014, we expect to field 5,000 women Afghan national police officers.
That is a tough job. And I want all of us to support that, because part
of what we have to do as we try to test whether peace is possible in
Afghanistan, is to make it very clear that peace will not come at the
expense of women's rights and roles. They have suffered too much for too
long. (Applause.)
So, I would be eager to hear thoughts and
perspectives. I look around this room and I see great colleagues,
colleagues from the United States Senate -- Susan Collins, who is here, I
don't know if we have anyone else from the -- anybody else from the --
oh, Loretta Sanchez, who is from the House, and then other colleagues of
mine in government, colleagues from the EU, from NATO, from other parts
of our work together. So I would be delighted. And, of course, I am
always pleased to be with the President of Kosovo, who has been such a
great representative for her country. (Applause.)
