Video: Hillary Clinton at the Budget Hearing for Department of State
Budget Hearing for
the Department of State and USAID
Testimony
Hillary Rodham Clinton Secretary of State
Washington, DC
February
29, 2012
May
I change out my chair for that chair right there? Thank you. I very much
appreciate that. That’s much better.
Well, let me begin by thanking the chairwoman for her leadership along with
Ranking Member Lowey. I have found this to be a committee that is so concerned
about what’s right for our country, especially in a time of constrained
resources. I always feel like I have an open door, and I hope you do as well –
all of you on this committee – because we’re living in a very volatile and
difficult time.
Before I begin, I want to say a few words about North Korea. And with your
permission, I want to just share with you the statement that we just put out.
We are looking to a continuing effort and we have completed a third exploratory
round of U.S.-North Korean bilateral talks to improve the atmosphere for
dialogue and demonstrate its commitment to denuclearization. North Korea has
agreed to implement a moratorium on long-range missile launches, nuclear tests,
and nuclear activities at Yongbyon, including uranium enrichment activities.
The DPRK has also agreed to the return of IAEA inspectors to verify and
monitor the moratorium on uranium enrichment activities and confirm the
disablement of the five-megawatt reactor and associated facilities.
Now, the United States, I will be quick to add, still has profound concerns,
but on the occasion of Kim Jong-il’s death, I said that it is our hope that the
new leadership will choose to guide their nation onto the path of peace by
living up to its obligations. Today’s announcement represents a modest first
step in the right direction. We, of course, will be watching closely and
judging North Korea’s new leaders by their actions.
We also have agreed to meet with the North to finalize administrative
details necessary to move forward with a proposed package of 240,000 metric
tons of nutritional assistance along with the intensive monitoring required for
the delivery of such assistance.
Now, this is just one more reminder that the world is transforming around
us, from Arab revolutions to the rise of new economic powers to a more
dispersed by still dangerous al-Qaida terrorist network to nuclear diplomacy on
the Korean Peninsula. In this time, only the United States of America has the
reach, the resources, and the relationships to anchor a more peaceful and
prosperous world.
The State Department and USAID budget we discuss today is a proven
investment in our national and economic security, but it is something more. It
is a down payment on American leadership.
When I took this job, I saw a world that needed America but also one that
questioned our focus and our staying power. So we have worked together in a
bipartisan fashion to put American leadership on a firm foundation for the
decades ahead. We have ended one war, we are winding down another. We have cemented
our place as a Pacific power while maintaining our alliances across the
Atlantic. We have elevated the role of economics within our diplomacy, and so
much else. We are necessarily updating our diplomacy and development for the 21st
century. And after the first-ever Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review,
we created two new bureaus focused on counterterrorism and on energy, Chairman
Rogers – and I’d be happy to go into that because it is critically important –
and we reorganized a third one focused on fragile states.
Now, like most Americans in these tough economic times, we did make
difficult tradeoffs and painful cuts. We have requested 18 percent less for
Europe, Eurasia, and Central Asia. We are scaling back construction, and I will
certainly tell everyone to keep an eye on the Embassy in London. We are
improving procurement and we are taking other steps for greater efficiencies.
Of the Foreign Ops request, $51.6 billion represents USAID and State
Department requests, and that is an increase of less than the rate of
inflation, just over 1 percent of the federal budget.
I just want to quickly highlight five priorities.
First, our request allows us to sustain our vital national security missions
in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, and reflects temporary extraordinary costs
of operating on the front lines. As President Obama has said, “The tide of war
is receding.” But we still have to establish firm relationships in Iraq and
Afghanistan to go forward in developing a positive partnership.
In Iraq, civilians are now in the lead as we try to work to help Iraq
develop a stable, sovereign, democratic country. And we have increased our
civilian budget, but State and USAID together are asking for only one-tenth of
the $48 billion the U.S. Government spent on Iraq as recently as 2011. Defense
spending, as all of you know so well, is now $40 billion less than just two
years ago. So we are certainly seeing increases in civilian presence but
dramatic decreases in federal outlays.
Despite this past week’s violence, we expect similar government-wide savings
in Afghanistan. This year’s request supports the ongoing transition. Next door
in Pakistan, we have a challenging but critical relationship. We continue to
work together on counterterrorism, economic stability, regional cooperation.
Second, in the Asia Pacific we are making an unprecedented effort to build a
strong network of relationships and institutions, because we believe in the
century ahead no region will be more consequential to America’s economic and
security interests.
As we tighten our belts around the world, we are investing the diplomatic
attention necessary to do more. In Asia, I call it forward-deployed diplomacy.
It includes even pursuing a possible opening in Burma.
Third, we are intently focused on the wave of change sweeping the Arab
world. Alongside our bilateral and security support, we are proposing a $770
million Middle East and North Africa incentive fund. There are two reasons for
that, Madam Chairwoman. First, we know from past experience we need a fund of
money that is flexible and easily deployed after consultation with Congress, as
we did after the fall of the Soviet Union. In 1989, such a fund was established
just for Poland and Hungary in the cost of $1 billion for two countries. After the
war between Georgia and Russia, we had a fund of a billion dollars just for
Georgia. So we think there’s precedent, and it certainly does pay off in terms
of American presence and responsiveness.
Secondly, what we found this past year is that there were a lot of
circumstances that were coming up all the time that we had, in no way,
predicted prior to the budget. So we need to have credible proposals that are
evaluated by rigorous analysis and by the Congress to commit to democratic
change, building effective institutions, and broad-based growth. And this
budget request also will allow us, Chairman Dicks, to help the Syrian people
survive a brutal assault and plan for a future without Assad.
It continues our assistance for civil society and Arab partners in Jordan,
Morocco, Tunisia, and elsewhere. It does provide, Mrs. Lowey, a record level of
support for our ally, Israel. It makes possible our diplomacy around the world
and, through the great work of the Congress and our diplomacy at the UN and
elsewhere, the toughest sanctions that Iran has ever faced.
The fourth priority is what I call economic statecraft – how do we use
diplomacy and development to create American jobs? We have more than 1,000
State Department economic officers working to help American businesses connect
to new markets and consumers. Every single day, we are working with our largest
corporations to our smallest businesses, pushing back against corruption, red
tape, favoritism, distorted currencies, intellectual property theft. And we have
worked closely together to pass three free trade agreements that will create
tens of thousands of American jobs, and we hope to work with Congress to ensure
that as Russia enters the WTO, foreign competitors don’t have an advantage over
American businesses.
And finally, we are elevating development alongside diplomacy and defense.
Poverty, disease, hunger, climate change destabilize societies, sow the seeds
for future conflicts. Through the Global Health Initiative, we are
consolidating programs, increasing our partners’ capacity, shifting
responsibilities to host countries that helps us target our resources where
they are most needed. Along with our Feed the Future Initiative to drive
agricultural growth and improve nutrition, we think we’re making cost-effective,
results-oriented investments. We want to see measureable outcomes.
Now these five priorities are each crucial to American leadership and they
rely on the work of some of the most capable, hardest working, bravest people I
have ever met – the men and women of State and USAID. Working with them is one
of the great honors I’ve had in public life.
Let me end by just saying that American leadership is very personal to me.
It is my job everywhere I go. And after three years, 95 countries, over 700,000
miles, I know very well what it means to land in a plane that says United
States of America on the side. People look to us to protect our allies, stand
by our principles, serve as an honest broker in making peace, to fight hunger,
disease, poverty, to stand up to bullies and tyrants. And American leadership
is not just respected; it is required. It takes more than just resolve; it does
take resources. This country is an unparalleled force for good in the world,
and we all want to make sure it stays that way, so I would urge respectfully
that you work with us to continue making this investment in both strong
American leadership and a more peaceful and prosperous future for us all.
Thank you, Madam Chairwoman.