Showing posts with label William Jefferson Hague. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Jefferson Hague. Show all posts

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Secretary Clinton's Statements on the Start of Polling for the Southern Sudan Referendum


Southern Sudan Referendum


Press Statement

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
January 9, 2011

The successful start of voting for the Southern Sudan Referendum represents a historic step towards implementation of Sudan’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement.

The people of Sudan deserve a process that is credible, peaceful and that ultimately reflects their will. Significant progress has been made in recent months towards preparing for the referendum, including the successful completion of voter registration and other technical arrangements. Going forward, the work of the many domestic and international observation and monitoring groups will be crucial and we look forward to their assessment.

We welcome the leadership shown by both parties to the CPA, including the commitment by President Bashir that his government will respect the outcome of the referendum. We also appreciate the parties’ acknowledgment of the importance of continued cooperation regardless of the outcome. This spirit will be important as the parties negotiate the post-referendum arrangements that will define their future relationship.

The United States is committed to the long-term security and prosperity of both north and south Sudan and we will continue to support the Sudanese people. We welcome the ongoing engagement of the international community as Sudan moves forward and we salute the strong leadership by the United Nations Mission in Sudan. We will work closely with all our international partners to maintain strong international support for the referendum process, successful implementation of the CPA, and a peaceful and prosperous future for all of the Sudanese people.

In addition, the Secretary issued a joint statement with the Norwegian Foreign Minister and the UK Foreign Secretary.

Joint Statement on the Start of Polling for the Southern Sudan Referendum


Media Note
Office of the Spokesman
Washington, DC
January 9, 2011


Following is the text of a joint statement by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Støre, and United Kingdom Foreign Secretary William Hague on the start of polling for the Southern Sudan referendum.

Begin Text:

We welcome the start of polling today for the Southern Sudan Referendum. This represents a historic step towards completion of Sudan’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement. We recognise the significant progress which has been made in recent weeks towards preparing for the referendum, including the successful completion of voter registration and other technical arrangements. We welcome the preliminary reports of the UN Secretary General’s Panel on the Referenda in Sudan, Carter Center, European Union, and other international and domestic observation missions, which stated that arrangements are now in place that provide a firm foundation for a credible referendum to take place.

We call for all efforts to ensure peaceful and credible completion of the referendum process in a manner which reflects the will of the people of South Sudan. The Southern Sudan Referendum Commission and Southern Sudan Referendum Bureau have made enormous efforts under significant pressure and deserve to be commended for their work. We welcome the leadership shown by both Sudanese parties. President Bashir has made clear that his Government will respect the outcome of the Referendum. We welcome this commitment.

We are encouraged by the strong public commitments of both Presidents Bashir and Kiir to continue negotiations on post-referendum issues and to foster cooperation between the North and South regardless of the referendum result. We welcome these commitments as well as their pledge that the safety and security of all peoples in Sudan will be protected throughout this process. It is vital that these commitments are upheld.

The situation in Abyei remains of deep concern. We commend the people of Abyei for their patience in recent months. The outstanding issues must be resolved in a calm and measured manner and we emphasise again to both parties their responsibilities to urgently resolve the impasse. Clear communication is also vital to reassure the communities on the ground that their concerns will be addressed and underscore that the parties will reconvene negotiations at the earliest possible date. It is also of great importance that popular consultations in Blue Nile and Southern Kordofan states are conducted expeditiously and inclusively.

The work of the many domestic and international observation and monitoring groups is crucial. We welcome their continuing engagement. We also welcome the strong leadership by the United Nations Mission in Sudan. We will work closely with all international partners to maintain strong international support for the referendum process, and successful completion of the CPA.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Video: Secretary Clinton's Remarks With British FM Hague



Remarks With U.K. Foreign Secretary William Hague After Their Meeting


Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
November 17, 2010


SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I’m delighted to welcome Foreign Secretary Hague back for his second visit to the State Department this year. Of course, we’ve been in close and seemingly constant contact since he became foreign secretary. We were together in New York yesterday for a session of the UN Security Council which William chaired and we’ll be together again in Lisbon for the NATO summit at the end of this week.

We have discussed a range of important issues – our shared mission in Afghanistan, the difficult choices that the United Kingdom has made in seeking to rebalance its government expenditures. We are very grateful for the strong commitment that the U.K. has given on so many security issues and particularly for their 10,000 troops, the brave young people serving in Afghanistan. And I appreciate too the trainers that are going to be committed to helping us expedite and improve the training of the Afghan security forces.

We discussed our shared priority of achieving a comprehensive peace in the Middle East. The foreign secretary briefed me on his recent trip to the region, and I briefed him on our intensified efforts along several tracks to encourage the Israelis and Palestinians to resume direct negotiations.

I want to thank the secretary and the United Kingdom for announcing this week an additional 1 million pound contribution to the Independent Special Tribunal for Lebanon in 2011. Both the United States and the United Kingdom strongly support Lebanon’s sovereignty and independence, and the work of this tribunal, which is intended to end impunity for political assassinations.

We continue to share a deep concern about Iran’s nuclear program. Again, the U.K. has shown great leadership in this area, and the foreign secretary and I are staying in close communication about the way forward. We have said many times we are committed to meeting with Iran to resume P-5+1 discussions. The EU High Representative Catherine Ashton has offered a date for such discussions to the Iranians, and we urge Iran to confirm this meeting so we can move forward.

The foreign secretary and I also discussed at some length the Balkans. We both are committed to helping the countries in the Balkans achieve full integration into the Euro-Atlantic community and we support a direct dialogue between Serbia and Kosovo. And I would like to again thank the U.K. for its leadership and the Security Council and its leadership in NATO and in the EU. There are so many important issues that we are working together on, and I cannot imagine having to face all of these issues without the close collaboration with the foreign secretary and the partnership between our two countries.

FOREIGN SECRETARY HAGUE: Well, thank you very much indeed. It’s six months since we last stood here together when I was a new foreign secretary. I’d been the foreign secretary for about 36 hours at that moment, I think. This was the first place that I visited. And six months on, I particularly want to thank Secretary Clinton for the great friendship, for the excellent working relationship, for the constant discussions that we have on all of these issues. And we had an excellent dinner last night talking about so many of these things and have gone over so many more of these issues this morning.

And yesterday, indeed, we were together in New York at the Security Council situation – Security Council session that I chaired on the urgent situation in Sudan, and I want to thank the United States and thank Secretary Clinton for the immense interest shown in that. It is the prime focus of our presidency of the Security Council this month, and we’re pleased we can work so closely with the United States in our efforts on Sudan.

This afternoon, I’m going to deliver a speech at Georgetown University and for the first time since I was a student in 1982 (inaudible) particular location on the theme of international security in a networked world and on the unshakable partnership between our two countries. I will say in that speech that there will be no reduction in Britain’s global role under this government or in our commitment to working with the United States on the pressing security challenges that we face. As we saw very recently with the al-Qaida cargo plotting its plane flying to the United States, we have a very clear, long-term vision of Britain as an active global power and the closest ally of the United States – as Secretary Clinton herself has put it, the United States partner of choice in mitigating the threats of the 21st century. And we’re determined that our cooperation in diplomacy, defense, counterterrorism, and intelligence continue to be without parallel in the world.

We have indeed talked about the Middle East and the pressing need for Palestinians and Israelis to come back to direct talks to find a just and sustainable two-state solution. And I commend strongly the American Government’s tireless efforts in that area, to which we will continue to give full and active support.

We will be at the NATO summit in Lisbon addressing the latest developments and the plans for the future of Afghanistan, of course, adopting a new strategic concept there.

And on Iran, just a word. Our intense concerns about Tehran’s nuclear program remain. We worked together to put in place strong sanctions that have put real pressure on the government in Iran. We want to negotiate a peaceful resolution of these issues, but Iran’s leaders should know that our resolve is real and that our determination will not slacken on this issue.

It’s been very useful to discuss the Western Balkans, in particular the situation in Bosnia. Our progress remains elusive, and real international focus is needed.

So I repeat my thanks again to Secretary Clinton and this Administration and this Secretary of State. I’ve really seen in the last six months that Britain has a great friend, and it’s a huge pleasure to work together. Thank you.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you.

MODERATOR: Andy Quinn, Reuters.

QUESTION: Madam Secretary, good morning.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Good morning.

QUESTION: The Israelis are saying that they want the new U.S. security guarantees in writing, and I’m wondering, are you willing to do this if it would speed up any Israeli decision on reinstating the moratorium?

And for the foreign secretary, the Chancellor of the Exchequer Mr. Osborne said today that Britain stands ready to support Ireland in its current financial crisis, and FT has referred to the possibility of billions of pounds in loans. Has your government had any specific discussions with Ireland, about that, what that help might entail? Are you, in fact, considering loans, and if so, at what level? And more broadly, the Irish crisis is being described as a struggle to save the EU. Do you agree with that assessment?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Andy, I can’t get into details. I can only repeat what I have said, that we are in close touch with both the Israelis and the Palestinians. We’re working intensively to create the conditions for the resumption of negotiations that can lead to a two-state solution and a comprehensive peace, because we continue to believe strongly that it is only through negotiations between the parties themselves that all final status issues can be resolved and the conflict ended, because the current status quo is unacceptable.

FOREIGN SECRETARY HAGUE: And on the questions you raised about Ireland, the chancellor exchequer has made the position on this clear. Ireland has not made a formal request for assistance. They are a sovereign nation. It is up to them whether to do so. As the chancellor has said, it is in our national interest to assist if we are asked to do so, but we’ll have to consider any such requests, if and when it arises.

And I wouldn’t go for the dramatic language you’re trying to lead me in about – into some saving the EU. Clearly there are difficulties in the euro zone, and it’s very much in Britain’s interest that there is stability in the euro zone, even though we are not members of the euro. And I’m sure we will surmount those difficulties. But the European Union, in any case is – it’s about much more than that. And so you’re using too dramatic language in your question, as you know. (Laughter.)

MODERATOR: And finally Mark Mardell of BBC.

QUESTION: Mark Mardell, BBC. Looking forward to Lisbon and Afghanistan, Secretary of State, is 2014 a hard deadline, which cannot flip, for handover? And a similar question to the foreign secretary: Can you see – can you envisage British troops being there longer than that date?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, first let me say that I think that the Lisbon summit will be a demonstration of unity and affirmation of the strategy that we are pursuing. And our goal, which is the goal set forth first by President Karzai in his inaugural address, is to have full transition to Afghan security by 2014. We expect to begin the process of transition this next year, 2011, where we believe there are now areas and sufficiently trained security forces for the Afghans to assume control. They are, in effect, in control of areas now, and we’re in the midst of doing a review as to how this would be sequenced. But certainly the goal that will be endorsed at Lisbon is a transition that will conclude in 2014.

FOREIGN SECRETARY HAGUE: I’m in complete accord with that. As you would expect, the U.K. and the U.S. work very closely together on this. There are great improvements taking place in the Afghan National Security Forces. They’re now 264,000 strong overall, and they will be more than 300,000 strong in the course of next year. I don't want to understate the challenges that remain. Of course, in making sure they have the expertise, and logistics, and engineering, and intelligence, these remain great challenges in building up the effectiveness of those armed forces. But they are challenges we can meet with sufficient dedication to, with sufficient commitment to training. And the United Kingdom has recently moved additional resources into training those forces.

And we can do that over this next four years. Four years is quite a long time. I was mentioning at a meeting earlier, that is the length of the entire First World War, in which great armies were assembled and great conflicts took place. And so we should be able to do that. We’ve said clearly what we said about 2015. The prime minister has made our position clear on that. But that is consistent with the objective of Afghans being able to lead and sustain their own security operations throughout Afghanistan by 2014.

MODERATOR: Thank you very much.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you all.

FOREIGN SECRETARY HAGUE: Thank you.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Pics of the Week: Hillary Clinton at UNGA and CGI

This is just a review of the past week on a slow Hillary-news day when I hope Mme. Secretary is resting up after her whirlwind week in New York City. There were so very many photos taken of her this week, I plucked out my favorites.

Sunday, September 19, 2010: Arrival day. We see her friend and Pakistani counterpart Shah Mahmoud Qureshi in the background here.

Hillary and blue: Perfect together!
Monday, September 20, 2010: Here she is speaking at a function for Haiti earthquake recovery.
At the same event with Haitian Prime Minister Jean Max Bellerive whom I like very much for being on the ground on the Champs-de-Mars where the people had gathered the day after the earthquake. He was the one member of government who made himself visible to and among the traumatized Haitian people.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 with her fella at the 6th Clinton Global Initiative. Wolf Blitzer did a long interview with the former POTUS and said that CGI is beginning to overshadow UNGA!

These beautiful photos are with one of her very dear friends from SEWA whom she has known for many years.

Bill looked like he was hanging on her every word. You can see the love in his eyes when he watches her speak.
Later that day arriving at a meeting of the Quartet.
With Tony Blair at the Quartet meeting.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010 as UNGA gets off the ground she greeted her UK counterpart William Jefferson Hague. I always refer to him by his full name since I find it so incredible that he is only a surname away from Bill Clinton (who has a much better head of hair).I do like pictures of her with her hand on the back of a chair. One day I will round up all the ones I have like this for a slideshow. Beautiful smile!
This is another posture I love along with the cute face. Everything about these pictures reminded me of those adorable pictures from NATO last December when she was also wearing red and David Miliband was so obviously taken with her.
Hillary is gorgeous and really does not need make-up at all, but she takes pains to look her best representing us. I love this picture with the Turkish PM looking over her shoulder.
This is my very favorite of the whole week. She is absolutely exquisite! Could not be lovelier!
I do not know what it is about this one that sucks me in. Her hands, the way she is holding the paper and pen? Her hair, pretty without being fussy? The shawl? I love her shawls. They had the A/C up too high for the sensitive little SOS.
Friday, September 24, 2010 at a meeting in New York City with President Obama.
On the same day at her bilateral with Mahmoud Abbas.
What a week, Mme. Secretary! You came through it all looking gorgeous - my Keatsian commentary for the week.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Hillary Doesn't Think William Jefferson Hague Is A Geek, Either!

I have not received anything in print that is relevant to Mme. Secretary's activities today (except for her schedule which arrived about an hour after I posted it). She is looking lovely today, however, so I wanted to share thse pictures at least. In several you see her with UK Foreign Minister William Jefferson Hague. In case you are unaware, the header refers to a recent remark by Hague's predecessor and now Shadow FM, David Miliband. When accused of being a geek on a TV talk show, he defended himself by saying, "Well HILLARY didn't think I was a geek."

While FM, Miliband betrayed signs of having a crush on Hillary (although it was widely and erroneously reported the other way around). Today's photos are reminiscent of photos taken with the now cast-aside David at a NATO conference last December. Here is one you will remember.



And here are some pics of the day with Mme. Secretary in red once again and looking mighty pretty.















Friday, July 16, 2010

Secretary Clinton's Phone Conversation with UK Foreign Minister Hague

Well at the end of one of those weeks when the Secretary of State worked largely behind closed doors, we have no public remarks or statements directly from Madame Secretary today. She did begin today with a very early morning phone conversation with UK Foreign Minister William Hague. In today's press briefing, P.J. Crowley highlighted the topics discussed. (I put Madame Secretary's picture here instead of P.J.'s because she's prettier. I am sure P.J. would agree,)


Philip J. Crowley
Assistant Secretary
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
July 16, 2010
... this morning, the Secretary had a conversation with Foreign Secretary Hague. The primary purpose of the call was to compare notes prior to Prime Minister Cameron’s visit to Washington next week. But she also used the opportunity of the call to thank the United Kingdom for its support of the new U.S.-EU agreement regarding the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program. And the two agreed on the importance of continuing our efforts to prevent terrorists from using our financial systems to launch attacks.They also talked about the situation with respect to Mr. Megrahi. Both the Secretary and the foreign minister agreed that in our mutual views, the release of Mr. Megrahi last year was a mistake. The Secretary just signaled to the foreign secretary ongoing congressional interest in this matter. And I think we’ll have more conversations with the British Government on this as we – as Congress continues to focus on the issue.

QUESTION: Where is the foreign minister right now? I don’t think he’s in London. He’s traveling, I believe. Anyway, that’s neither here nor there if you don’t know. Did they talk about the Iroquois case at all?

MR. CROWLEY: They did not.

QUESTION: So basically, that’s a dead letter as far as you’re concerned?

MR. CROWLEY: Well, from our standpoint, we’ve done what we can do. And it would appear to us at this point that the UK has made their final determination.

QUESTION: Okay. And on the BP thing, have you been invited – has anyone from State been invited to the hearings that Senator Kerry is going to be holding and --

MR. CROWLEY: At this point, no.

QUESTION: Do you expect to have someone at the hearings?

MR. CROWLEY: Again, that’s up to the chairman to decide who he wants to attend them – Kerry.

QUESTION: And what would – when you say that more conversations with the British are likely on this subject, what – why would more conversations be necessary after --

MR. CROWLEY: Well, obviously, the Secretary’s mindful that she has a request by the – a handful of senators to look into this matter if we haven’t decided what steps we will take. But clearly, the information that would need to be revealed by any follow-up action is resident within the UK Government and the Scottish Government. So, in anything that we do, we would need their cooperation. So she mentioned the issue, mentioned its importance not only to the Congress, to our government, but most importantly, to the families of the 103 victims. And I think we will be – continue to work with them to see how we can answer the questions that have been raised in recent days.

QUESTION: Did she specifically ask for cooperation from the British Government?

MR. CROWLEY: At this point, we have not made a specific ask of the British Government. The purpose of the --

QUESTION: Well, in general?

MR. CROWLEY: Right, but this was to alert the foreign secretary of the importance of the issue, and in fact, obviously, I think that’s already recognized within the UK. BP has put out statements in the last couple of days. So has the new government in the UK. Again, in the conversation, they agreed that in our joint view, this was a mistake. But we’re still evaluating how we can best work through the requests that the senators have made of us.

QUESTION: Did they indicate that the British Government might be amenable to cooperating if such an investigation is launched? And did the Secretary say that this was likely to come up when the prime minister visits next week?

MR. CROWLEY: I mean, the Secretary indicated that it might be appropriate for the British Government to communicate with Congress as well to make sure that they fully understand what transpired a year ago. That was something mentioned. Again, I’ll defer to the British Government to decide exactly what precise action they’ll take.

QUESTION: And how about the meeting next week? Is it likely – did she say that this might be on the agenda when the prime minister visits?

MR. CROWLEY: It was not that specific. I mean, the Secretary and the foreign secretary will also see each other in Kabul.

QUESTION: About how long was the call and how much of it was devoted to this --

MR. CROWLEY: It was 12 minutes. And the bulk of the call was devoted to specific issues related to the prime minister’s visit next week.

QUESTION: Which did not include the BP, so how much of a – what percentage of those 12 minutes were devoted to the BP issue?

MR. CROWLEY: (Laughter.) I can’t tell you. Seven minutes and 43 seconds. I can’t go --

QUESTION: Oh, so then most of it then.

MR. CROWLEY: I don’t know. I don’t know. (Laughter.)

QUESTION: P.J., what exactly does Congress want the Secretary to do, to find out?

MR. CROWLEY: Well, I don’t have the letter in front of me from the four senators. I think they want us to look into circumstances surrounding the decision by Scottish authorities a year ago. Obviously, there have been more than one correspondence. There are questions regarding the medical advice – who gave it, how was it considered, how did the Scottish authorities reach a judgment that on humanitarian grounds, based on an understanding that Mr. Megrahi had a relatively short time to live, that they would make this decision to release him on humanitarian grounds. That’s one area. And clearly, some questions have been raised about the fidelity of the medical information that entered into the Scottish authorities’ thinking.

On the other hand, there are questions about BP and its contacts with the UK Government in a kind of – in an earlier timeframe regarding the negotiation of a prisoner transfer agreement between the UK and Libya. And I think the UK has been clear that these two issues were worked on separate tracks.

So, we are – the purpose of her mentioning it today was simply to highlight for the foreign secretary this is a very important issue to the American people and it is going to be something that we will be addressing for a period of time. As we have pledged, we will respond to the four senators, and like I say, we’re working through how – what is the best way to provide the perspective to the Senate that they’ve requested.

QUESTION: Can we change the subject?

MR. CROWLEY: Sure.

QUESTION: Can I just ask one more on that? Is there any attempt or is the State Department looking into any type of pressure that it could put on Libya to reverse Libya’s original decision? Or actually, I should say to reverse the return of Mr. Megrahi to Libya. Is there anything that the U.S. could do – some are asking?

MR. CROWLEY: Well, I mean, again, this – I mean, in terms of pressure, obviously, we continue to express our concern and to state categorically that every day that Mr. Megrahi spends as a free man in Libya is an affront to the families and victims of Pan Am 103. That is how we believe and that’s – I think that’s a firmly held belief by the American people.

From a legal standpoint, this – his sentence was – the case was carried out and the sentence applied under a special Scottish tribunal. We respect the fact that this was a decision that the Scottish authorities had the authority to make. We regret that decision. As to whether we have any legal recourse, these are the kinds of things we’re looking into. It’s unclear that we do.

Personally, I think this call was much more about that letter from the senators and BP's alleged involvement in the release of Al Megrahi. We know Secretary Clinton is a woman of her word. We LOVE that about her! If she says she will do something, she will. On the other hand sometimes she says she will not do something and then later she changes her mind. We love that, too.

If she told the senators she would look into this matter, that was probably the central reason for this phone call. She was not happy with that release last year and made it very clear to then FM David Miliband. I think she wanted to warn Hague that this is a BIG ISSUE here where BP has already earned demerits. If the Prime Minister and a delegation are visiting DC next week, Americans are sure to expect this issue addressed. Any press availability during this visit will be vulnerable to this topic. I think Secretary Clinton wanted him to know he had better come armed for this. Anyway, that is my two cents.

Monday, May 17, 2010

Hillary & David: The Final Chapter

Hearts of Hillary Clinton's fangirls across America were broken and sore last week because of an election on the other side of the pond! The much ballyhooed (and nonexistent, if we are to depend on hard evidence) "crush" on David Miliband hit a major stumbling block. His Labour Party was defeated, and he was required to tender his resignation. The mournful sighs rippled across the amber waves of grain even as his replacement, one William Jefferson Hague, made hasty arrangements to hop the pond and meet with the dazzling (and I do mean dazzling, with all my heart) U.S. Secretary of State.


I have always maintained that it was David who was crushing on Hillary and not the other way round. In that lengthy White House YouTube (Happy Birthday, YouTube!) of President Obama at the UN Security Council Summit on Nuclear Nonproliferation from last September, it was David who got all squirmy when she arrived, and he could not take his eyes off her except when she glanced in his direction, while she was completely oblivious of him. But I digress.

This interesting article about the spoils of office in the U.K., specifically grand mansions known as "grace and favour residences" allotted to cabinet ministers, attributes a remark to our Hillary Clinton that not only made me LOL, but also seems to have put David in his place. I love her sense of humor.

Hillary Clinton correctly predicted Labour’s chances of winning the General Election back in January by making a dinner party joke at the expense of former Foreign Secretary David Miliband.

Mr Miliband boasted about his official country residence, inviting the U.S. Secretary of State to stay there.

Mrs Clinton replied: ‘That would be lovely, David, but you had better do it before May 6’

Read more>>>>

I shall leave it to readers to discuss amongst themselves the implications of the invitation itself. He wanted her to stay at his house? You can't blame him! But her answer is a hoot!

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Hillary Clinton and William Jefferson .... No, the OTHER one!

Nipping this one right in the bud, I am!

William Hague enchants Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton looks as surprised as the rest of us by Britain's Lib-Con coalition government

Richard Adams's blog
William Hague and Hillary Clinton

William Hague explains to Hillary Clinton how the Lib-Con coalition will work. Photograph: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA

Hillary Clinton met with a leader from a new government formed in the wake of disputed election results ... yes, that was yesterday when she met with Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan. Today, though, she met with William Hague from the rock-solid Lib-Con British coalition government – and they also discussed Afghanistan.




READ MORE>>>>


Oh, Richard, Richard, Richard, what are you trying to start with that header? Nowhere in their public remarks did that word appear. Of course in French, one of the diplomatic languages, when one is introduced, a polite response is "Enchanté," however, they already knew each other, and that would not be a common response in the native language they share. It is far more likely that in place of the formal "How do you do?" Hillary used her, "How ARE you?" as she did with the new Estonian Foreign Minister who became rather flustered and flattered because he might not have known that when we say that, we are not really asking how the person is. Not really. (Or maybe he wass just blown away by meeting Hillary Clinton.)


Whether it is "How are you?" or "Nice to meet you," in English, "Enchanté," in French, "Encantada" in Spanish, it is all simply phatic language, formulaic and nothing more. It serves to signal that we recognize another human being in our presence. Now I realize that Adams was being facetious with that header, and the rest of the article was anti-climactic (you will excuse the expression) at best, but there are people who read the headers and not the articles, so it was irresponsible of him to post it.

At any rate, whatever she said to him, she says that to all the guys. She is capable of continuing the special relationship without ... er... HAVING a special relationship. Does she flirt? Of course she does, and she is superb at it! But I strongly doubt she means anything by it. Will she flirt with Hague? Probably! But let's not read too much into that. Her flirting is also a form of phatic language. It serves to signal that this pretty woman acknowledges a man in her presence, and that maybe, by being friendly, cheerful, and pleasant, she might get a good commitment on Afghanistan. Furthermore, she has her own William Jefferson Somebody at home, as you know.