SECRETARY CLINTON:
Thank you, Vishakha, and thanks also to John Thornton and Jamie Metzl
and the board members who are gathered here this afternoon. It is a
great pleasure to be back here in this magnificent building and to have
the chance to thank you for the Asia Society’s work over many decades to
strengthen the relationship between America and the people and
governments of Asia. Before I begin, let me just take a moment to
say that my thoughts and prayers today are with the families who lost
loved ones in the tragic crash of Continental Flight 3407, with those
who live in Clarence Center where this tragedy occurred, and with the
entire Buffalo community. I know the strength and compassion of the
people of western New York and have no doubt that they will pull
together and support each other through this difficult time. I was
deeply saddened to learn that among those who were taken from us too
soon was Beverly Eckert, who herself lost her husband in the attacks of
September 11th. Beverly became known to me and a friend to me
and to many New Yorkers for her tireless advocacy for the families of
the victims of 9/11, and she was one of the principal champions of the
idea of the creation of the 9/11 Commission. I will miss her, and I want
to just publicly thank her for all she did in the midst of her own
tragedy. A half century ago when the Asia Society was founded, Asia
was frozen in a cold war, wracked by poverty, and seemingly destined for
desolation. Few in or outside of Asia’s borders foresaw anything but a
future of conflict, occupation, and despair. Today, the countries I will
visit are at peace. Asia is on the cutting edge of so many of the
world’s innovations and trends. It is a contributor to global culture, a
global economic power, and a region of vital importance to the United
States today and into our future. Over the past 30 years, I’ve had
the privilege of traveling to a very different Asia. Whenever I think
back on my visits, it’s as if a movie reel of images, old and new, were
running through my head. I think of the elegant temples of Kyoto, or the
rituals of nomadic life outside Ulaanbaatar, the intricate handwork of
traditional craftspeople in Chiang Rai, the vibrant markets of Hanoi,
Hong Kong, and Dhaka; the grand hotels of Singapore and Manila, the
calligraphers practicing their art in Xi’an, the historic dress of Seoul
and the traditional dances of Jakarta, or the strum of the sitar in New
Delhi. And I’ve seen also the skyscrapers and factories, the urban
corridors and high-tech campuses, the research facilities and modern
hospitals – a continent where, now, more often than not, the rule of law
and free elections have become or are in the process of becoming the
norm, where entrepreneurship and innovation have transformed economies
into global economic powers. Asia has influenced world civilization
for millennia, as it has our own culture. Our nation is home to 13
million Asian American citizens, and our daily life is so enriched by
Asian literature and art, by music and movies, by food and architecture,
medicine and science, technology and values. Today, it is tempting
to focus our attention on the tensions and perils of our
interdependence, but I prefer to view our connectedness as an
opportunity for dynamic and productive partnerships that can address
both the challenge and the promise of this new century. And that’s
what I want to talk about today, how the United States is committed to a
new era of diplomacy and development in which we will use smart power
to work with historic allies and emerging nations to find regional and
global solutions to common global problems. As I’ve said before, America cannot solve the problems of the world alone, and the world cannot solve them without America.
At the same time, given the realities of today’s world, we can no
longer approach our foreign policy solely country by country, or simply
by carving the world into separate regions. With smart power, we will
seek to build partnerships that transcend geographic and political
boundaries. In the months ahead, I will press for stronger
bilateral, regional, and global cooperation when I meet with leaders of
Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa, just as I will seek
more robust engagement in my discussions with Asian leaders in Tokyo,
Jakarta, Seoul, and Beijing next week. In making my first trip as
Secretary of State to Asia, I hope to signal that we need strong
partners across the Pacific, just as we need strong partners across the
Atlantic. We are, after all, both a transatlantic and a transpacific
power. Our relationships with each of the countries I’m visiting,
and with all of our partners and allies throughout Asia and the Pacific,
are indispensable to our security and prosperity. When we consider the
gravest global threats confronting us – financial instability and
economic dislocation, terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, food
security and health emergencies, climate change and energy
vulnerability, stateless criminal cartels and human exploitation – it is
clear that these threats do not stop at borders or oceans. Pandemics
threaten school children in Jakarta and Jacksonville. Global financial
crises shrink bank accounts in Sapporo and San Francisco. The dangers
posed by nuclear proliferation create worries in Guangzhou as well as
Washington. And climate change affects the livelihoods of farmers in
China’s Hunan province and in America’s Midwest. These dangers affect us
all, and therefore we all must play a role in addressing them. So I
leave for Asia ready to deliver a message about America’s desire for
more rigorous and persistent commitment and engagement, ready to work
with leaders in Asia to resolve the economic crisis that threatens the
Pacific as much as any other region, ready to strengthen our historic
partnerships and alliances while developing deeper bonds with all
nations, ready to help prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons in
Asia, ready to expand our combined efforts on 21st century challenges like climate change and clean energy, pandemics, and income inequality.
In the Obama Administration, we are also ready to reach beyond
ministerial buildings and official meeting halls, as important as those
are. We’re ready to engage civil society to strengthen the foundations
needed to support good governance, free elections, and a free press,
wider educational opportunities, stronger healthcare systems, religious
tolerance, and human rights. And we are ready to listen. Actively
listening to our partners isn’t just a way of demonstrating respect. It
can also be a source of ideas to fuel our common efforts. Too often in
the recent past, our government has acted reflexively before considering
available facts and evidence, or hearing the perspectives of others.
But President Obama and I are committed to a foreign policy that is
neither impulsive nor ideological, one that values what others have to
say. And when we have differences, which we will, we will discuss them
frankly and specify those which limit our capacity to cooperate. As part
of our dialogues, we will hold ourselves and others accountable as we
work to expand human rights and create a world that respects those
rights, one where Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi can live
freely in her own country, where the people of North Korea can freely
choose their own leaders, and where Tibetans and all Chinese people can
enjoy religious freedom without fear of prosecution. Existing
problems today, we believe, are opportunities as well. Exercising smart
power begins with realistic assessments of the world we inhabit. And
this obliges us, no less than other nations, to acknowledge our own
contributions to the global problems we face. Let me start with the
global financial crisis that hit us first and hit us deeply. Across the
United States today, families are losing jobs, homes, savings, and
dreams. But this is not our crisis alone. Its repercussions are also
being felt in parts of Asia and elsewhere around the world. We have
recently heard forecasts from South Korea’s new finance minister that
their economy will shrink by 2 percent this year, with 200,000 jobs
potentially lost. A Chinese Government survey of villages last week
reported that 20 million of the nation’s 130 million migrant workers are
unemployed. In Japan, a new analysis predicts a larger economic
contraction than previously forecast. Indonesia’s exports fell by more
than 20 percent in December as growth estimates have also fallen. And
Taiwan’s economy reported a record 44 percent drop in exports.
Throughout Asia, the demand for durable goods is way down. The
global financial crisis requires every nation to look inward for
solutions, but none of us can afford to become so introspective that we
overlook the critical role that international partnerships must play in
stabilizing the world’s economy and putting all of us back on the path
to prosperity. And we cannot respond with a race to erect trade and
other barriers. We must remain committed to a system of open and fair
trade. Here at home, our government is working to address the
housing crisis and restore the banking system. Congress is expected to
pass a stimulus package that represents the largest government effort in
a generation to create jobs and increase incomes. China, Australia, and
others in Asia are responding vigorously. We need multiple engines
working together to reignite global growth. At the G-20 meeting in
Washington in November, leaders pledged to take actions from adjusting
fiscal policy to strengthening domestic regulation. The upcoming G-20
meeting in April in London will provide us with an opportunity to build
on that pledge. Like the financial crisis, other issues also require
bilateral as well as regional and global approaches. The United States
is committed to maintaining our historic security alliances in Asia and
building on those relationships to counter the complex global threats we
face. I’m very pleased that Japan and South Korea this week agreed to
joint assistance for reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan, and that
both countries continue to work with us on global security, especially
in combating piracy off the Horn of Africa. We will need to work
together to address the most acute challenge to stability in Northeast
Asia, North Korea’s nuclear program. The Obama Administration is
committed to working through the Six-Party Talks, and I will discuss
with South Korea, Japan, and China how best to get the negotiations back
on track. We believe we have an opportunity to move these discussions
forward, but it is incumbent upon North Korea to avoid any provocative
action and unhelpful rhetoric toward South Korea. The North Korean
Government has committed to abandoning all nuclear weapons and to return
at an early date to the Treaty on Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
We continue to hold them to those commitments. If North Korea is
genuinely prepared to completely and verifiably eliminate their nuclear
weapons program, the Obama Administration will be willing to normalize
bilateral relations, replace the peninsula’s longstanding armistice
agreements with a permanent peace treaty, and assist in meeting the
energy and other economic needs of the North Korean people. On a
related matter, I will assure our allies in Japan that we have not
forgotten the families of Japanese citizens abducted to North Korea. And
I will meet with some of those families in Tokyo next week. Global
solutions are essential to addressing climate change and the need for
clean sources of energy. Now, climate change is not just an
environmental nor an energy issue, it also has implications for our
health and our economies and our security, all wrapped up in one.
The rapid appointment that the President and I made of a United States
Special Envoy for Climate Change reflects the seriousness we feel about
dealing with this urgent threat. And I will be taking Special Envoy Todd
Stern with me to Asia next week to begin the discussions that we hope
will create the opportunities for cooperation. Now, our nation has
been the largest historic emitter of greenhouse gases, and we
acknowledge that we must lead efforts to cut harmful emissions and build
a lower-carbon economy. But each of the countries that I’m visiting
also have a role to play in this effort. I will press the case for clean
energy in both Japan and South Korea, and look for ways to work with
Indonesia as well. Orville Schell’s commentary in Time magazine
this week reminds us that collaboration on clean energy and greater
efficiency offers a real opportunity to deepen the overall U.S.-Chinese
relationship. So we will work hard with the Chinese to create
partnerships that promote cleaner energy sources, greater energy
efficiency, technology transfers that can benefit both countries, and
other strategies that simultaneously protect the environment and promote
economic growth. While in Beijing, I will visit a clean thermal
power plant built with GE and Chinese technology. It serves as an
example of the kind of job-creating, bilateral, public-private
collaboration that we need so much more of. Now, you may have
heard me describe the portfolio of the State Department as including two
of national security’s three Ds: defense, diplomacy, and development.
Each is essential to advancing our interests and our security. Yet too
often, development is regarded as peripheral to our larger foreign
policy objectives. This will not be the case in the Obama
Administration. We will energetically promote development around the
world to expand opportunities that enable citizens, particularly on the
margins, and particularly women and children, to fulfill their God-given
potential, which we happen to believe will advance our shared security
interests. That much of Asia enjoys peace and prosperity today is due in
no small part to American efforts over the last half century to support
political, economic, security, and educational alliances with Asian
nations. We are proud to have lent American assistance in response
to natural disasters, including rebuilding efforts after the tsunami in
Indonesia and the cyclone in Burma. And we commend the Indonesian people
and government for settling longstanding civil conflict in Aceh that
threatened the country’s progress, and for similar positive efforts to
achieve peace and stability that are working in Timor-Leste.
Indonesia is one of Asia’s most dynamic nations, where human energy and
aspiration combine to help lead the country to a free and fair system of
elections, a free press, a robust civil society, and a prominent role
for women in the Indonesian Government. We will support Indonesia and
other countries in the region that are actively promoting shared values.
And we look forward to working with our other partners and friends in
the regions, allies like Thailand and the Philippines, along with
Singapore, Malaysia, and Vietnam, to ensure that ASEAN can live up to
its charter, to demonstrate the region’s capacity for leadership on
economic, political, human rights, and social issues. Let me also
thank Australia for its leadership and friendship over decades. While
I’m not able to visit Australia on this trip, we know that Australia is
one of our most trusted allies in the world. And as we have all seen in
the news, wildfires have devastated the state of Victoria during the
past week. President Obama and Prime Minister Rudd have discussed the
situation by phone. And we have sent forest fire specialists to help the
Australians out. We want our Australian friends to know that we mourn
with them over the loss of innocent lives in this tragedy, and we remain
grateful for our work together in the past and what we will do together
in the future. Let me now give you a brief rundown of some of the
key issues that I will be addressing next week, country by country,
starting with my first stop in Japan. Our security alliance with Japan,
50 years old next year, has been, and must remain, unshakable. In Tokyo,
I will sign the Guam International Agreement, which will position our
security alliance to meet the challenges of this time by moving 8,000
American troops from Okinawa to Guam. Japan is also to be commended for
taking on a bigger leadership role in addressing the economic crisis in
Pakistan and for working on collaborative efforts to explore space, cure
disease, and offer relief to victims of disasters around the world. We
anticipate an even stronger partnership with Japan that helps preserve
the peace and stability of Asia and increasingly focuses on global
challenges, from disaster relief to advancing education for girls in
Afghanistan and Pakistan to alleviating poverty in Africa. We also
will focus on the very fertile ground for cooperation that we believe
exists with Indonesia. I don’t need to remind you that our new President
is well known and much admired there. We now have an opportunity for
stronger partnerships on education, energy, and food security. The
Indonesian Government has also suggested the creation of a deeper
partnership with the United States. This idea represents a positive
approach to areas of common concern, and we are committed to working
with Indonesia to pursue such a partnership with a concrete agenda.
In South Korea, we will be visiting with one of our staunchest historic
allies. And certainly, everyone who has followed the history of South
Korea joins me in admiration for the transition that we have observed
from static conditions of the past century to the dynamic state that
South Korea finds itself in today. The United States and South Korea are
both committed to expanding trade in a manner that benefits both of our
countries, and we will work together to that end. As members of the
Asia Society, you know very well how important China is and how
essential it is that we have a positive, cooperative relationship. It is
vital to peace and prosperity, not only in the Asia-Pacific region, but
worldwide. Our mutual economic engagement with China was evident during
the economic growth of the past two decades. It is even clearer now in
economic hard times and in the array – excuse me – in the array of
global challenges we face, from nuclear security to climate change to
pandemic disease and so much else. Now, some believe that China on
the rise is, by definition, an adversary. To the contrary, we believe
that the United States and China can benefit from and contribute to each
other’s successes. It is in our interest to work harder to build on
areas of common concern and shared opportunities. China has already
asserted itself in positive ways as chair of the Six-Party Talks and in
its participation in international peacekeeping efforts. And our two
countries, I’m happy to say, will resume mid-level military-to-military
discussions later this month. And we look forward to further improved
relations across the Taiwan Strait. Even with our differences, the
United States will remain committed to pursuing a positive relationship
with China, one that we believe is essential to America’s future peace,
progress, and prosperity. An ancient Chinese story tells of warring
feudal states, whose soldiers find themselves on a boat together
crossing a wide river in a storm. Instead of fighting one another, they
work together and survive. Now, from this story comes a Chinese aphorism
that says, “When you are in a common boat, you need to cross the river
peacefully together.” The wisdom of that aphorism must continue to guide
us today. So I will leave for Asia Sunday with a firm commitment to
work very hard with our partners across the Pacific, to strengthen our
engagement so that the positive transformations of the past half-century
are replicated, mirrored, made stronger and more obvious in this
century. We have such an opportunity that I hope we will seize, but it
is not just up to our government to do so. It is also up to Americans
across our country, those of you here in the Asia Society, in the
private sector, in academia, in labor and the professions, in
nongovernmental organizations all. Let us commit ourselves to providing
the kind of outreach and responsiveness, understanding, and commitment
that will lead not just to a better understanding, but positive actions
to improve the lives of our own people here and those who live in Asia
today. Thank you all very much. (Applause.) MS. DESAI: My goodness. SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you. (Applause.) MS. DESAI:
Please stay seated for a little while longer. First of all, thank you
so much for such an amazing, encompassing speech that I know is going to
be heard around the world, as it is being heard now. The Secretary
has actually agreed to take a few questions. I want to just remind you
all that we really want to focus on East Asia. So those of who say, “How
come she didn’t say anything about India,” we’re not doing it now –
(laughter) – just so you know. Because there’s another time. And the
fact is that the Special Representative Richard Holbrooke is actually in
South Asia now, and we don’t want all of our heavy power all to be in
the same place at the same time. So do not ask those questions. And what
I’m going to do is that we actually have questions from online
audience, as well as here, and we have selected a few to see if you
would give some answers. The first one is very simple, but we would
love to hear from you about what you think is the significance of having
your first trip as Secretary of State to Asia and not somewhere else? SECRETARY CLINTON:
Well, I believe it demonstrates clearly that our new Administration
wants to focus a lot of time and energy in working with Asian partners
and all the nations in the Pacific region because we know that so much
of our future depends upon our relationships there. And we equally know
that our capacity to solve a lot of the global challenges that we’re
confronting depends upon decisions that are made there. So it was an
easy choice for me to make. Obviously, we are focused on the many
problems that exist today that we’re confronting. Right off the bat,
actually, the very first day I walked into the State Department and the
second day of his Administration, both President Obama and Vice
President Biden came to the State Department to make the announcements
that I had asked them to do, naming George Mitchell as our Special Envoy
to the Middle East and Richard Holbrooke as our Special Representative
to Afghanistan and Pakistan. So clearly, we are focused on many parts of
the world. We are in preparation right now for the NATO Summit that will be coming up in Europe. I will be going to Cairo on March the 2nd
for the Donors Conference that Egypt is hosting on humanitarian aid for
the people of Gaza. I will be helping to tee up what we do with the
Summit of Americas that is coming in April that will be very important
for our neighbors to the south, as well as ourself. We have a lot of
challenges in Africa that we are working hard to address. So it’s a
big world, and we have a lot of work to do. And I think there has been a
general feeling that perhaps we didn’t pay an appropriate amount of
attention to Asia over the last years, being very preoccupied with other
parts of the world, so I wanted to start at the very beginning
demonstrating our commitment there. MS. DESAI: Thank you. That was from Robert Kindle of ARD German Broadcasting from Washington, D.C.
The next question is from our own Vice Chair sitting in San Francisco,
Jack Wadsworth. And he’s asking, and I will paraphrase the question,
that under the Paulson-Bush era, the primary focus of U.S.-China
dialogue has been economic. What do you think are the risks or potential
benefits of broadening this agenda? SECRETARY CLINTON: Well,
it’s an excellent question, and it’s a apt description. Secretary
Geithner and I have already met about this because we believe that the
Department of State and the Treasury Department should be playing a
mutually reinforcing role with respect to the broad range of issues that
the United States and China should be discussing. We think that this
provides us with the opportunity to engage at all levels of government
simultaneously. How we’re going to structure those dialogues is
something that I will be discussing with the Chinese leadership this
coming week. But it is important that we understand how broad and deep
the concerns that we share truly are. You know, I made a reference
to energy and climate change. We are, as I said, the historically
largest emitter, but China has just surpassed us. They are now the
largest emitter. And this has such direct effects on healthcare and
indices of quality of life, as well as the economy and so much else. So
we want to have a very broad discussion. How we structure it is
something we’re going to work out mutually with the Chinese. MS. DESAI:
Well, sometimes people have said that since Secretary Geithner would be
so focused on the economic stimulus package here and what happens at
home, does that mean that State will actually take more of a leadership
responsibility for the organization of these under your leadership? SECRETARY CLINTON: Well,
we know that the Secretary, along with much of the rest of our
government, is focused on getting our own economy up and going. But what
we can do and the sequencing of how effective our recovery will be is
very intimately connected with what the Chinese are doing and the
decisions they’re making. So the economic dialogue is a broad one to
start with. There are aspects of it that I think, you know, very much
belong within the Treasury portfolio. But there are other aspects which
cut across the entire range of issues that we would like to address with
the Chinese. So that’s why Secretary Geithner and I have been working
out our own approach. There have always been, alongside the
strategic economic dialogue that Treasury led during the Bush
Administration, senior dialogues on a range of issues, plus
defense-related discussions. So there’s been a lot going on, but partly
out of choices that were made in the last eight years, the economic
dialogue, led by the Treasury Department, really did assume a larger
role than a lot of these other concerns. And we think that it is in our
mutual interest to work out a way that all of these important issues are
discussed on an ongoing basis, and that’s what we intend to do. MS. DESAI:
Well, I must say from the Asia Society perspective, it’s wonderful that
you and the Obama Administration generally have focused so much on
climate change because of our own work under the leadership of Orville
Schell. But I should also tell you that Tim Geithner happens to be a
good friend of this institution because Peter, his father, who is the
head of the Asia region in Ford Foundation, was also a good friend. So
we’re delighted that you will be working together, and we hope he will
be here as well. SECRETARY CLINTON: I will extend the invitation. MS. DESAI: Right. Thank you. (Laughter.) SECRETARY CLINTON: I don’t know if they’ll let him out of Washington for anything -- MS. DESAI: Not yet. Not yet. SECRETARY CLINTON: -- anythingyet. MS. DESAI:
This is an interesting question. North Korean Philharmonic wants to
hold a concert in New York, in response to when the New York
Philharmonic went there. Is there any condition in changing the
atmosphere before such visas could be granted? SECRETARY CLINTON: Well,
I am hopeful that we will be able to engage the North Korean Government
in the kind of serious discussion that I referred to in my remarks, one
that could lead with their fulfilling their commitments regarding
denuclearization and nonproliferation to bilateral relations and
opportunities for the kind of normalization that I think many would hope
to see. So much of it depends upon the choices that they make. But
we will look at all of these individual decisions – like the
Philharmonic coming here, for example – and consider whether or not that
does help us to try to change the atmosphere to increase the
connections between North Koreans, and certainly, Americans get it off
of just the government-to-government Six-Party Talk and bilateral
discussions that have been the, you know, predominant or only way of
that kind of formal relationship. So much of it depends upon the
choices that the North Korean Government makes. And certainly, we are
hopeful that they will not engage in provocative actions and words that
could create a much more difficult path for us to walk with them. MS. DESAI:
This is about the Bretton Woods Institution. Some experts have called
for a revision of the Bretton Woods Institution and the UN – especially
the Security Council, as you know – so that it would account primarily
also for the increasing role of Asian states in global, economic and
political affairs. How, if at all, do you think these institutions might
accommodate and engage a rising Asia? SECRETARY CLINTON: I
think the discussions that have been started in the G-20 and also at the
G-8 level, as well as within multilateral institutions like the IMF,
the World Bank, the WTO, as well as within governments, should
vigorously consider and debate whether we need new institutions, whether
we need to, you know, reframe some of the regulatory processes that
need to be in place. This should all be on the table, and I know that
certainly, the Obama Administration is going to be implementing new
regulations in our own economy that we think will make the free market
work better and be more effective without the kind of distortion and
interference that some of the decisions that we’ve seen over the last
several years have caused. So I think that there is a great – a
great receptivity, but the devil is in the details, and there hasn’t
been the kind of hard work yet done to determine whether the – you know,
the son of Bretton Woods is a realistic possibility or not. And I’m
hoping that that will be part of the broader agenda. I know it’s on the
minds of the President and the Treasury Secretary and the National
Economic Council led by Larry Summers. So from my perspective, I
think it’s important for the United States to lead and rebuild
confidence in our own markets to demonstrate that we’ve learned the
lessons that the last months have unfortunately brought home to us, in
order to both answer the legitimate criticism from others around the
world and assuage their concerns about our economic position. In order
to continue to be the preeminent economic power in the United States, we
have to take actions here that will position us for that kind of
future. And I hope that with the President’s leadership, you’ll see that
happen. MS. DESAI: As you have said numerous times,
actually, that often in Asia, people have said after their last
financial crisis that we gave them lots of advice on what to do. And
many Asians now come back and say, “But America hasn’t followed its own
advice.” And therefore, we have to reclaim that position again -- SECRETARY CLINTON: That’s right. MS. DESAI: -- of credibility. It’s important. SECRETARY CLINTON:
I think that – I mean, everyone talks about our current financial
crisis as being as much one of confidence and trust as of, you know,
credit. And I really believe that we’ve got to take steps here in order
to demonstrate exactly what Vishakha is saying, that we’ve cleaned up
our own house and we’ve done it in a smart way, where we haven’t
crippled our capacity to, you know, be the global, you know, credit
center, to be a market maker, to do all that is done so well
historically in this city. But you don’t have to travel very far to
hear the voices of doubt and even the explicit criticism coming from the
leaders of other countries. And it’s my hope that, you know, again,
we’ll have a public-private partnership to address these concerns,
answer them, and, you know, lead the global recovery so that we can once
again, you know, be promoting and creating prosperity here at home as
well as around the world. MS. DESAI: This question is partly
related, but somewhat different, and this question is from Michele
Ehlers and she’s a co-founder of Global Visionary – Global Leadership
Network in Fremont, California. And her question is: How can we
upgrade our American dream to a global vision that the earth can sustain
and that is supportable for every human being? If we Americans wish to
be known for our leadership in the world and be recognized as true
partners in global development, we need to take on a new model of life
that’s sustainable and possible for every human being. How can you best
advocate that? SECRETARY CLINTON: That’s a great question,
and it was a question that maybe five years ago would have been, you
know, thought of as kind of touchy-feely, to be honest about it –
(laughter) – and would not have been entertained seriously in a lot of
the boardrooms and the decision-makers’ meetings and halls of
legislatures. But I think it is an issue that we have to be smart
about addressing. You see, the threat of global climate change, the
intimidation created as we’ve seen in Europe by control over energy
supplies, the fear that globalization has not spread its benefits
broadly and deeply enough, those are all opportunities for Americans,
primarily in the private sector and also in our government, to start
kind of solving these problems, and to do so with the same level of
energy and ingenuity that we have brought to problems in the past.
We have such an opportunity here, and I’m hoping that, you know, some of
the provisions that made their way through the difficult negotiations
over the stimulus package will have the result of helping to jumpstart
and support research. We’ve got to get back to supporting basic science
in America. It’s one of our greatest advantages. And we have not been
keeping up with our potential for leading the way in science,
technology, and research. So I would hope that the answer to the
question asked doesn’t, in any Americans’ minds, sort of create the
image that somehow, we would have to give up our way of life. I mean,
that seems to always end up being the debate, that, you know, this will
be economically ruinous for us, this will cause us to fall behind, we’ll
lose out in what the American dream should be, in a material sense.
And I just don’t buy that. I don’t believe that is the way forward.
Now, do we have to change some of how we live? Yes. But, you know,
changing to compact fluorescent bulbs is not the kind of sacrifice that
is going to undermine the quality of our life. (Laughter.) You know, it
-- MS. DESAI: You know, in Australia, now they already have made that as a law. SECRETARY CLINTON: That’s right. MS. DESAI: You know, so -- SECRETARY CLINTON:
That’s right. And so I think there’s – you know, you can go from the
small steps that each of us can take, which, in the aggregate, would add
up to significant changes, to the kind of governmental driven decisions
that you’ll see more of in the Obama Administration. Our new Secretary
of Energy Steven Chu is absolutely focused on how he can make the case
that changes in our uses of energy, and in how we both create it and
deliver it, would go a long way toward enabling us to live a better,
more sustainable life. You know, even though the legislative changes
that have been made in California over the last 35 years have resulted
in a lower per capita usage of electricity than in the rest of the
country – and I don’t think people in California feel like they’re
deprived. So part of what we have to do is have the leadership in
both the public and the private sectors look to academia – you know, ask
for good ideas – and then begin implementing them, and do so with
courage and a pioneering spirit. You know, we are supposed to be the
problem solvers. You know, that’s who we’re supposed to be. And it’s
time, when we face these global challenges, we demonstrate that that’s
who we continue to be. And I’m excited by it. I think, you know, our
children and our children’s children will live very well if we make the
right decisions now. And if we don’t, I don’t think we can look them in
the eyes and make that claim, and I don’t want to live like that as an
American. I think it’s far preferable that we step up to our
responsibilities, and I know that’s what the President is trying to
encourage us to do. MS. DESAI: Well, it’s sort of – you talk about smart power in international relations. This is about smart energy use -- SECRETARY CLINTON: That’s right. MS. DESAI: -- domestically and -- SECRETARY CLINTON: Yeah, smart grids. MS. DESAI: Exactly. SECRETARY CLINTON: Smart cars. MS. DESAI: Right. SECRETARY CLINTON:
You know, I mean, it’s not going to happen overnight. But the idea that
we just continue putting off the future when we’re supposed to be the
country of the future is so contrary to our nature. And it is, I think,
causing some puzzlement around the world. But also, people are going to
say, “Well, we’ll take advantage of those opportunities.” You know,
whether or not we have a modern battery industry is up to us. Whether or
not we have a smart electric grid that will save energy and be able to
decentralize energy production and usage is up to us. Whether or not we
sort our way through our automobile crisis and end up with cars that are
energy savers as – insofar as transportation permits is up to us. And
you can go down the list. These are not somebody else’s responsibility,
and I think we have to have a very significant government commitment,
and that’s what we’re trying to do in the Obama Administration. It’s
still difficult to make the case. I mean, a lot of what was in the
stimulus originally, which would have set the path for us, you know, was
not left in because it was thought to be, you know, economically
challenging, should be left to – completely to the private sector. Well,
we forget we electrified the country because the government stepped in.
You know, we have so many examples from our past where we went as far
as we could with the private sector, but frankly, it wasn’t profitable
to bring electricity to the northern reaches of New York and the
Adirondacks or northern Arkansas. The interstate highway system – we
built highways to places that were barely populated, which are now
booming. I mean, we made decisions that drove our growth and they were
government and business decisions, and I think we’ve got to get back to
thinking about that and feeling like we’re all on the American team for
the next decade so that we can reassert our position economically here
at home and around the world. MS. DESAI: On that note, we
must bring this to an end. I just want to say that with our foreign
policy in your hands, our heart is at ease. SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, thank you. MS. DESAI: Please join me in thanking Secretary Clinton. (Applause.)