"Everybody
thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a
Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers
today? Her numbers are dropping."
- House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy 09/30/15
Hillary registered her distress speaking with Reverend Al on Politics Nation.
SHARPTON: Let me raise another issue. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, he said this week, quote -- I'm quoting him -- "Everybody thought Hillary
Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special
committee, a select committee. What are her numbers Friday? What are her
numbers today? Her numbers are dropping." That's the quote.
CLINTON: Um-hmm.
SHARPTON: You're expected to testify before the Benghazi Committee on October 22. What's your response to McCarthy's comments?
CLINTON:
I have to tell you, I find them deeply distressing. I knew the
ambassador that we lost in Benghazi. Along with him, we lost three other
brave Americans who were representing us in a very dangerous part of
the world.
There have already been eight investigations in the
Congress. One independent investigation. We have learned all we can
learn about what we need to do to protect our diplomats and our other
civilians and we need to be enforcing and implementing those changes,
which is what I started and what Secretary Kerry has continued.
So
when I hear a statement like that, which demonstrates unequivocally
that this was always meant to be a partisan political exercise, I feel
like it does a grave disservice and dishonors not just the memory of the
four that we lost, but of everybody who has served our country.
We've
had lots of different situations, as you know so well. We've had
embassies run over. We've had them blown up under Ronald Reagan, under
Bill Clinton. We've had lots of attacks where we lost Americans or
foreigners working for America, under George W. Bush. We can go back and
there's a wall in the State Department, there's a wall in the CIA where
we lost those civilians we lost.
It's never been turned into a
partisan political battle by the majority in Congress the way the
Republicans in this Congress have done. And I just wish that they would
really start tending to the people's business, deal with the many
problems that we face and figure out how we're going to move our country
forward.
You know, I -- I really regret the way that they have treated this serious matter.
SHARPTON:
There's a lot of cynicism, a lot of people don't trust what's going on
in government. Does this add to it, when you hear a statement by the
majority leader? Does this add to the kind of cynicism that many of us
are trying to counter?
CLINTON: I think it does. I mean when this
happened, I immediately said, I want an independent review board. I want
to know everything that we could have done differently. I want to
change the procedures. I took responsibility because I wanted us to get
to the bottom of what we could understand about that attack.
And
that's been my position from the very beginning. When I was asked to
testify before this committee, it was after a year of my asking to go
testify, because I said I'd be willing to go. I hope they actually ask
me about Benghazi and what happened and what we need to do better to
protect our people while we still are in dangerous parts of the world.
After
Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) admitted that Republicans lied about the
purpose of the Benghazi investigation, several top Democrats are calling
out the House Republicans’ abuse of power and calling for an immediate
end to the investigation
SNIP
The ranking member of the Select Committee on Benghazi, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) said,
“This stunning concession from Rep. McCarthy reveals the truth that
Republicans never dared admit in public: the core Republican goal in
establishing the Benghazi Committee was always to damage Hillary
Clinton’s presidential campaign and never to conduct an even-handed
search for the facts. It is shameful that Republicans have used this
tragedy and the deaths of our fellow Americans for political gain.
Republicans have blatantly abused their authority in Congress by
spending more than $4.5 million in taxpayer funds to pay for a political
campaign against Hillary Clinton.”
SNIP
Rep.
Linda Sanchez (D-CA) called for an immediate end to the Benghazi
investigation and for Republicans to apologize to the families of the
Benghazi victims, “Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy pulled the
curtain back on the true purpose of the Select Committee on Benghazi –
not to get the facts – but instead as a political ploy against former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. This stunning admission shows a
gross misuse of millions in taxpayer dollars for a purely political
purpose. I believe it is time to end this investigation and for Speaker
Boehner, Majority Leader McCarthy, and Chairman Trey Gowdy to apologize
to the families of the four Americans who died during the attack and the
American people for abusing the memories of Ambassador Chris Stevens,
Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.”
It
is impossible for Bill Clinton to be before TV cameras without being
asked about Hillary and the 2016 campaign. That was the case last
night. He pointed out weaknesses in Republican debate and campaign
substance saying that so far all he has heard are claims of who hates
and blames Democrats more. He asked, "What would you actually do?"
Is there an Americans who has not heard Donald Trump claim that Hillary Clinton was the worst secretary of state ... ever?
Burnett played that remark for Hillary's loving husband who nearly
spewed the water he was sipping and launched into a litany of Hillary's
accomplishments (a host of which are listed here addressed to Carly Fiorina).
He mentioned the New START treaty,
about which everyone on both sides of the aisle appears to have
developed amnesia. This was the exchange of instruments of
ratification.
He talked about her phenomenal success in exponentially increasing PEPFAR's effectivenesswithout increasing costs. (President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief began as a George W, Bush administration initiative.)
Directly
contradicting Trump's claim that Hillary lost friends for us, WJC said
that all of the countries that benefited from the PEPFAR efforts liked
us a lot after her work and that our approval rating was 20% higher when
she left office than when she arrived.
And there were the Iran
sanctions. He told Burnett and the audience that even people who do not
like the agreement liked the sanctions.
At the end of July, Hillary was "Skimmed." That day, the newsletter mentioned that all of the candidates would be "Skimmed." Today it was Marco Rubio's turn, and he said this.
THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL.
When
I'm president, we'll cancel it on my first day in office. We'll
reimpose the sanctions that are on the books. I'll ask Congress to
increase them on every sector of their economy. And it'll make it very
clear to Iran, if they want a peaceful nuclear program, they have to
pursue it the way South Korea does, the way Japan does, by importing the
enriched material. And if they try to build weapons, we're going to
destroy their weapons program.
Hillary
has called canceling the agreement reckless, but at least he liked the
sanctions. Clearly, once the Republicans really get into issues as
opposed to their sterling and stunning resumés, the Iran agreement will
be one of the hot-button issues.
I thought this might be a good juncture at which to share again a 2010 article from Esquireby Tom Junod who has said more than once that yes he would... he certainly would vote for her.
I felt better about myself as an American after spending time with Hillary Clinton for the profile of her that appears in the May issue of Esquire.
Seriously. It's not just the obvious — it's not just the fact that she
never appears so quintessentially American, as simultaneously
Daisy-Millerish and Tracy-Flickish, as when she
stands smiling on a stage with a bunch of European guys with permanent
five-o'clock shadows. It's not even that I wind up applauding my country
for producing a woman whose genius is for a kind of can-do
level-headedness that somehow manages to drive both enemies and admirers
around the bend. No, it's that after traveling to Montreal, London, and
Paris with the secretary of state — after listening to three of her
speeches and attending at least a dozen diplomatic ceremonies and then
interviewing her — I'm a little less concerned than I was about the
problem of American power. And because of Hillary Clinton, we should all
be a lot less concerned about the problem of a nuclear Iran (no matter the war games nor the cautious talk).
But
first, let's face it: The problem with American power is that there
seems to be less of it these days. We're fighting wars we can't win and
incurring debts we can't pay, and the upshot of all that is that we
can't tell other countries what to do. "You have to approach this
[diplomacy] with humility," Secretary Clinton told me. "Even if you
think we're right — and in fact I do believe we're right about the major
issues — you can't just assert it." Now, on the face of it that sounds
like a pretty standard, Obama-era formulation, right down to the encoded
reference to the Bush administration, whose policy of
diplomacy-by-assertion only wound up making us look at once decisive and ineffectual — decisively ineffectual, if you will. But the thing that makes it also a classic Hillary
formulation is the parenthetical insistence that she, and we, are
right. She has never been given to apology, and while this has caused
her some problems politically — think the Iraq war vote — it serves her
well as President Obama's secretary of state. She does not give you the
sense, as Obama sometimes does, that she's conducting foreign policy in
expiation of the sins of the previous administration, or for that matter
of the previous 234-odd years of American history. She's not guilty
about anything, least of all American power, and standing next to her is
like standing next to a Minuteman missile — you can have all sorts of
opinions about her, but ultimately you're glad that she's one of ours.
Going
forward into the debates and the next phase of the campaign, Junod's
articles are handy pieces for us all to keep in our back pockets.
I
see a lot of cheering. "Hillary 2016" "I will vote for her!" "She
will be our next president!" We need to arm ourselves for the battles.
Yesterday I shared an article from HuffPo
explaining how doctored video footage was used to eradicate ACORN
(Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) in 2010 and is
being used do the same thing to Planned Parenthood now. That article
also explained how manufactured information is used against the
Clintons.
It time to move on from the sloganeering and find out
whence potential attacks might emanate and what the facts are. A great
many people who are supporting Hillary know very little about what she
has done. We welcome new teammates. Junod's article is a good place to
start getting proficient in Hillary Clinton foreign policy. Today is a
great day to begin.
By PETER BAKER and JIM YARDLEY SEPT. 24, 2015
WASHINGTON
— Pope Francis, the spiritual leader of 1.2 billion Catholics,
challenged Congress and by extension the mightiest nation in the world
on Thursday to break out of its cycle of paralysis and use its power to
heal the “open wounds” of a planet torn by hatred, greed, poverty and
pollution.
Taking a rostrum never before occupied by the bishop of
Rome, Francis issued a vigorous call to action to lawmakers who have
spent years stalemated over major issues and even now are days away from
a potential government shutdown in a dispute over the moral boundaries
of federal spending. Read more >>>>
WASHINGTON — Speaker John A. Boehner,
an Ohio barkeeper’s son who rode a conservative wave to one of the
highest positions in government, said Friday he would relinquish his
gavel and resign from Congress, undone by the very Republicans who swept
him into power.
Mr.
Boehner, 65, made the announcement in an emotional meeting with his
fellow Republicans on Friday morning as lawmakers struggled to avert a
government shutdown next week, a possibility made less likely by his
decision.
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER SEPT. 29, 2015
WASHINGTON
— House conservatives, fearful that the post-John A. Boehner era of
leadership may look more like a modestly renovated old house than a
newly built one, have begun to cast about for one of their own to join
the upper ranks: the head of the committee that has been ripping into
Hillary Rodham Clinton for well over a year. Read more >>>>
Yes, that Trey Gowdy!
It is hard to know whether this script could be more absurd if Samuel
Beckett had written it. An element of drama is suspension of
disbelief. But this is not dramatic fiction. This is taking place in
our Capitol, and it is very real.
There is no question as to whom Gowdy has been targeting. He has twisted and contorted himself every which way like Brody on that crane hook to
aim at Hillary Clinton. Like a mouse in a maze he has tried every
avenue. Now his Tea Party partisans want to place him in the leadership position.
You cannot make this stuff up. We can never put
the absurd past the Republicans. I know this hits you like an "And now
this" segment from John Oliver's Last Week Tonight. It should. Like everything in those segments, this is actually happening.
There is only one explanation for an option so extreme. They fear Hillary Clinton. It is as pathetic as it is possible.
Still --
Carly Fiorina owes an apology to Planned Parenthood and the millions of women and men it serves.
She
should apologize for maliciously describing a video that doesn't exist
and, when confronted with that lie, doubling down on it.
She should apologize for her despicable lies on Sunday that Planned Parenthood is "aborting fetuses alive to harvest their brains."
She
should apologize for using her position as the only woman in the GOP
field to actually lead, instead of stop, the war on women.
But you
and I know Carly Fiorina won't apologize. Just like she never
apologized to the 30,000 HP workers she fired while shipping their jobs
overseas and taking a huge payout for herself.
Well, I know the
best way for us to send Fiorina a message. We can do everything in our
power to elect women who will stand with Planned Parenthood and fight
back against the GOP's war on women. Will
you send a message to Fiorina and other Republicans waging the war on
women by contributing $10 or more to PAC for a Change today?
The
House GOP already has three -- yes, three -- committees investigating
Planned Parenthood, and Cecile Richards, the organization's president,
is even testifying today.
None of these committees has found a
shred of evidence that Planned Parenthood is doing anything other than
providing cancer screenings, contraceptives, and other critical health
care for the women and men that rely upon it every day.
So, are
they closing down their bogus investigation? No. Instead, they have just
announced that they are going to create a new fourth committee to
investigate Planned Parenthood.
soEnough. It is time to end this war on Planned Parenthood and women across America.
It is time to make clear that this is 2015, not 1915. Contribute $10 or more to PAC for a Change today to stop the war on women and help elect progressive women across the country.
If we stand together, we can fight back -- and win.
In Friendship,
Barbara Boxer U.S. Senator
The
irony would be sublime if it were not so disgusting to see the only
woman on that GOP stage standing on an anti-female platform.
Finally! I have found someone else who sees history repeating itself
here. I was beginning to think I was the only person who remembered
how ACORN came down.
Anhvinh DoanvoBecome a fanResearch assistant for the Global Initiative for Civil Society and Conflict. Writer for The Hill.
Posted: 09/06/2015 9:14 pm EDT Updated: 09/08/2015 11:59 am EDT
Hannah
Giles, James O'Keefe, Peter Schweizer, and David Daleiden: These are
names the American public should know. Their writing, which thrives on
catchy headlines and specious content, has embodied modern-day yellow
journalism. Their investigations have masqueraded as a "public service".
But in reality, they have aimed to eviscerate political enemies,
regardless of whether their targets have committed any wrongdoing. In
fact, time after time, these hatchet jobs against Planned Parenthood,
Hillary Clinton, and Association of Community Organizations for Reform
Now (ACORN) have been debunked by federal investigations. Our demand for
accountability of our politicians and national institutions has been
poisoned by a failure to demand the same from our media and liars
operating under the façade of journalism.
Fast forward to the scandals of 2015 and we see quite comically, the same incidents have occurred. Soon after a Republican-dominated panel found that no wrongdoing was committed in the Benghazi scandal, Peter Schweizer published Clinton Cash.
In the book, he alleged that the Clintons used their positions in
government to benefit financial donors, including human rights violators
like Russia. Although the headlines have had some truth to them, in
that the Clinton Foundation's donation policies might need some reform,
they are ultimately deceptive to the American public. Multiple instances
cited in the book, like one where Clinton "could have stopped" Russia from buying a uranium mining company in the U.S., have been debunked by
organizations like FactCheck.org. When asked about the matter,
Schweizer himself noted that there was no direct evidence of wrongdoing,
though he remained unrepentant, saying that such evidence is not necessary to attack Clinton's record.
David
Daleiden's dishonest Planned Parenthood activities have been even more
disconcerting. He's ignited a political firestorm, with conservatives
claiming that Planned Parenthood has profited off fetal tissue, just as
they claimed that ACORN intentionally committed voter fraud. However, five investigations in Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Indiana, South Dakota, and Massachusetts, all thankfully early
enough to help defuse the issue, have found that no wrongdoing has been
committed by the organization. Conservatives have become so desperate
to find any mud to sling at the organization that Florida Governor Rick Scott attempted to scrub statements on evidence clearing Planned Parenthood in his investigation.
Hillary
has a message for the politicians attacking Planned Parenthood and
trying to cut off millions of Americans from lifesaving health care for
women and families—and Republicans should take note. Hillary Clinton
supports and stands with Planned Parenthood.#standwithPP>>>>>>>
If
we don't stay on track, we won’t be able to build the organization we
need to win Iowa, New Hampshire, and all of the other states on the way
to the Democratic nomination for president. Don't let that happen.
Before tomorrow at midnight, pitch in $5 or more (Zoey will thank you):
Thanks,
Dennis
Dennis Cheng National Finance Director Hillary for America
If it were not obvious from the outset, guess what? The political
nature of the Benghazi Select Committee is gaining notice! Wow! It has
taken only three years and a wasted $4.5 million not to find out what went wrong so that we can prevent similar attacks in the future. Correct the Recordshared this today, for those who need a picture.
But we have known it all along. We knew it less than a month after the
attacks when the House Oversight Committee accused State Department
officials of a political agenda.
Today was the first public session of the House Committee Oversight and Government Reform hearings on diplomatic security in Libya.
In closing today’s more than four-hour long session, chairman Darrell
Issa noted that although this is an election year, his committee wants
to find out what went wrong in Benghazi in order to prevent it from
happening anywhere again. If you buy that, I have a bridge for sale.
His admonishing tone, suggesting members of the panel might have an election year agenda, was startlingly inappropriate. Read on >>>>>
Resoundingly missing from the cover of the Interim Progress Report
on the Benghazi, Libya consulate attack published yesterday by the
House Republican Conference is the name Harold Rogers (R-KY), chairman
of the House Appropriations committee that twice slashed the State
Department’s diplomatic security budget. That committee was apparently
excused from reporting to the conference in the zealous crusade being waged by Tea Party Republicans,
led by Darryl Issa and Jason Chaffetz, to pin blame on then Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton. Issa’s name is listed as a co-author of the
report while Media Matters reports that Chaffetz appeared with Megyn
Kelly to discuss the report released to great hullabaloo in right-wing
circles. Read on >>>>
In astoundingly transparent fashion, the Republicans on the Select Committee on Benghazi have abandoned all pretense plans for investigating departments and agencies outside the State Department and individuals other than Hillary Clinton.
An article in The Hill
today reveals a letter from Select Committee Democrats to their GOP
counterparts accusing them of refitting the objectives of the committee
from inquiry and prevention into a political weapon aimed at the former
secretary of state. Thank you, Karen Finney, for sharing this because
regardless of what “we all knew all along,” here is the evidence. In the end evidence is all that really counts. It is our only weapon
It seems that truth is relative. Is it possible that discerning
truth involves applying a formula more complex, esoteric, and profound
than Einstein's or anything ever worked out by Stephen Hawking? Or is
it a simple matter of speaker identification?
For weeks, a word
association poll dominated the media because, and only because,
respondents associated words like "liar" and "untrustworthy" with
Hillary Clinton. This remained a top story and interview topic for an
extended period because, of course, Hillary Clinton is running for
president so we all need to know what some cherry-picked population
thinks of her.
The generalization that is then applied is that nothing
Hillary says is trustworthy. Everything is potentially a lie or
actually is a lie because Hillary Clinton said it. There can be no such
extenuating circumstance as a clouded memory due to transition from one
major role to another years in the past, for example. No way. If
Hillary says it, well, we just are not so sure it is true.
Carly
Fiorina is also running for president and referred in a campaign debate
to a video. Since that day, she has mentioned that video every time she
has a chance to speak to the media. Apparently the same principle that
applies to Hillary Clinton does not apply to her.
There
has been an impressive amount of angry liberal commentary, which has
spilled over into the mainstream press coverage (or do I repeat myself?)
of the issue, about how in the last Republican presidential debate
Carly Fiorina allegedly cited an entirely imaginary video in order to
make a crazy claim about Planned Parenthood’s brain-harvesting
ghoulishness that’s totally unsupported by the facts.
SNIP
...
for Fiorina to actually be proven as wildly misleading and
fundamentally dishonest as her critics keep suggesting, they would need
to marshal evidence beyond just a parsing of her words, and demonstrate
that the thing she’s describing is an inaccurate depiction of what happens inside abortion clinics that double as tissue procurement centers.
This is striking: "... they would need to marshal evidence beyond just a parsing of her words ...."
Seriously? How many times has Hillary been condemned with no evidence
except her parsed words, and worse by lies and words she did not say?
How many media outlets completely misquoted her after the Benghazi
attack using words that she never said?
Myth:
Hillary Clinton said the attack on the Benghazi installation was an
outgrowth of a demonstration against an anti-Islamist video on the
internet.
Not exactly. Here are her words on September 12, 2012.
We
are working to determine the precise motivations and methods of those
who carried out this assault. Some have sought to justify this vicious
behavior, along with the protest that took place at our Embassy in Cairo
yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the
internet.
The New York Times stands as a rather odd arbiter of truth given the very hard time they had admitting to ... well ... lying in a front page header a few months ago.
Rather than issue the apology they should have and that she is owed, the New York Times has chosen instead to publish this shabby, third-rate excuse for its unethical treatment of Hillary Clinton. Read more >>>>
I
suppose it is simply asking too much for the same principles to be
applied equally to statements by all candidates. I know some people
think I should get off Fiorina's case and that her own party will kick
her under the bus. I disagree. They like what she is saying and that
accounts for her rise in the polls and resultant presence on debate
stages and on the media.
I will stay on her case as long as she repeats this mantra.
As
regards Planned Parenthood, anyone who has watched this videotape, I
dare Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama to watch these tapes. Watch a fully
formed fetus on the table, it’s heart beating, it’s legs kicking while
someone says we have to keep it alive to harvest its brain.
Barack Obama is not running for president. It is clear that Hillary is really the only target.
So when Carly Fiorina attacks Hillary I will defend Hillary with the same vigor as when Donald Trump has done the same.
I
just heard Donald Trump say that Hillary Clinton was the “worst
secretary of state in the history of our country.” Apparently he
suffers from a linguistic disorder that causes him to make phonemic
substitutions. A phoneme is a meaningful unit of sound. Phonemic
production establishes differences in meaning between words.
There
is one phonemic difference between the words /fərst/ {first} and
/wərst/ {worst}. It occurs with the initial consonant. Mr. Trump’s
linguistic slip belies the facts. In two important instances, Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton was first. Read more >>>>
Full
frontal assaults, as Bill Clinton characterized the email/server
attacks, will not go unanswered. Especially when deceit is defended by
the media.
Following up on the Sunday interview, Chuck Todd shared the second part of his conversation with Hillary Clinton on the debut of Meet the Press Dailythis evening.
Topics
included ISIS and Syria, differences between a Hillary administration
and Obama for contrast, and WJC's role in a Hillary Clinton White House. To his credit, Todd excluded Benghazi from this portion.
Hillary said we defend our principles, values, and security via coalitions and
finding common ground. She still thinks we could have made a difference
in Syria by helping the original rebels with whom she met early on.
Defeating ISIS with Assad in place would be very difficult. Many groups
on the ground remain anti-Assad but Russian troops are protecting his
regime. Ousting Assad has to be a political process. She pointed out
long term relationships between Russia and Syria, among these the
Orthodox Church ties, as evidence that Putin's moves there are not a
sudden rash decision but rather rooted in a history between the nations.
Libya:
Qaddafi was a bad actor with American blood (Lockerbie) on his hands,
and the joint effort against him was legitimate. Libyans had twice
voted for moderates and did not receive support to instate moderate
government.
On TPP, she wants to see what is in it before taking a
stand. It is unfinished. She is waiting for the finished product
before taking a position.
She is firm on not criticizing Bernie
Sanders and is running her own campaign as is he. She did mention her
many endorsements from prominent Democrats without actually stating the
obvious, that Sanders is not a Dem. Once again has said she is not
running for anyone's third term but thinks her husband is a
great advisor.
Political polls aside, Meet the Press Daily's
chances for ratings are obviously up in the air. Tonight, Todd milked
Hillary's interview for the whole hour. How the hour survives will
depend on more than the occasional interview with the most sought after
candidate. Hillary is the big get. He got her for a rolling start.
She seemed happy to be there for him and wished him good luck.
As
world leaders convene in New York for the United Nations General
Assembly, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton told NBC News' Chuck
Todd she would pursue a fight against ISIS while at the same time
working to oust Syrian President Bashar Assad.
In an interview on MSNBC's MTP Daily,
Clinton said fighting ISIS would be "very difficult" with Assad still
in place and she would "prioritize both" because "you can't really do
one without the other." She added that "ousting Assad has to be a
political process."
"I think that we're going to have to, as they
say, walk and chew gum at the same time. And that will be to, you know,
do the best we can with our friends in the region to go after ISIS and
try to, you know, push them out of Iraq and then try to, you know, deal
with them and the territory they control in Syria," Clinton said. Read more >>>>
It was all about Pennsylvania. While Pope Francis was spending his
last day in Philadelphia, Chuck Todd took us all to Punxsutawney. Groundhog Day is a movie you either love or hate. It gets on my last nerve. If you missed Hillary on Meet the Press,
you really did not miss anything except that she looked great in
fuschia and laughed a lot in her musical way because what else can one
do?
At
the end of a week wherein she rolled out a plan for reducing
out-of-pocket prescription costs and could no longer hold her silence on
the Keystone XL issue, it was all about the server and the emails.
Again! There are video clips here, and the transcript is here.
If
revisiting these email and server questions are insufficient blasts
from the past, Hillary was followed by Carly Fiorina who doubled down on
the videos she and the GOP claim are evidence of Planned Parenthood
marketing fetal tissue. Not only is this chorus repeated endlessly
every time Fiorina faces a camera miked up, the strategy is reminiscent
of the video campaign against ACORN that brought that association down in 2010. ACORN was cleared of all wrongdoing too late.
On CNN meanwhile, Bill Clinton, who is kicking off CGI 2015, had to spend a good portion of his time with Fareed Zakaria on GPS
reminding the host that Hillary was subjected to false allegations in
the nineties and every time in every instance was cleared of all
wrongdoing. He also mentioned that she probably has more policies and funding plans out there than all of the other candidates rolled into one. None of this deters the server and email queries.
Later in the day, Pope Francis, during his last mass
in the U.S. delivered a homily that warned against inciting scandal and
encouraged honest cooperation. He urged peace in the home, and I do not
think he was talking only about nuclear families in our individual
homes. Certainly he knows what John Boehner did the day after his visit
to D.C. and why.
I think we were all hoping that this visit and
his messages might clear the air and allow some honest and substantive
discussion of issues. Will there ever be peace in this house?
Meet the Press will continue weekdays at 5 p.m. now, so a second part of
Hillary's interview will air tomorrow. Todd said that will be the
foreign policy portion. Let me guess: Benghazi.
It is Community Day in New Castle New York. The local grassroots
crew, Chappaqua Friends of Hill, were out bright and early in their custom-designed tee shirts to show their support for the hometown candidate with a table full of Hillary swag. Thank you to Grace Bennett who arranged the effort, lined up the
volunteers, got the Hillary gear, and supplied the great photos! As we can see, some of Hillary's very
young neighbors are on her bandwagon!
Congresswoman Nita Lowey and State Assemblyman David Buchwald both stopped by. Lowey accompanied Hillary on her final official trip to Africa as did Grace Bennett.