Just to keep the record straight, here are the 17 intel agencies that we have been hearing about since
Hillary Clinton brought them up during one of the debates.
Matthew Rosenberg of the
New York Times explains why Trump's remarks yesterday implying that not all 17 agencies were in agreement were
deceptivemisleading.
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] President Trump speaking in Warsaw on Thursday. During his speech, Mr. Trump yet again raised doubt about Russian meddling in the presidential election. Stephen Crowley/The New York Times[/caption]
By MATTHEW ROSENBERG
President Trump said on Thursday that only “three or four” of the United States’ 17 intelligence agencies had concluded that Russia interfered in the presidential election — a statement that while technically accurate, is misleading and suggests widespread dissent among American intelligence agencies when none has emerged.
The “three or four” agencies referred to by Mr. Trump are the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the F.B.I. and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, all of which determined that Russia interfered in the election. Their work was compiled into a report, and a declassified version was released on Jan. 6 by the director of national intelligence. It said that all four agencies had “high confidence” that Russian spies had tried to interfere in the election on the orders of President Vladimir V. Putin.
The reason the views of only those four intelligence agencies, not all 17, were included in the assessment is simple: They were the ones tracking and analyzing the Russian campaign. The rest were doing other work.
Read more »
Cross-posted at
The Department of Homegirl Security